Link & User Comments The comments posted below are thoughts expressed solely by the author, and do not reflect in any way opinions of the publisher of this website, or SexualOffenders.com
New Jersey Sex Offender Registry The New Jersey registry is not a complete and comprehensive listing of every person who has ever committed any sex offense in New Jersey, nor does it make information about every sex offender living in New Jersey available on the Internet.
Posted by: VICKI (not registered) on October 26, 2005 at 04:09 pm
I believe all New Jersey sex offenders should be registered and listed on line. This will allow parents to know POSITIVELY who their children need to stay away from.
Posted by: lisa (not registered) on October 28, 2005 at 10:27 am
As a new mom i feel it is important that we know who we are living around..I feel it must be inforced that they all register and people are notified if one is moving into an area where their is a large amount of children and schools. So we can protect our children and keep them safe...
Posted by: Anonymous (not registered) on October 31, 2005 at 02:02 pm
I live with someone who is classified as a "sex offender". At the age of 13 he was found playing doctor (NO penetration or sexual acts) with two other children that were in the scouts with him. They were 10, he was 13 years old. He had to undergo counseling and was on probation until he was 18 years old, he was adjudicated as a juvenile. Prior to this event he had been physically and sexually abused by his father. Since this event he has never been in trouble with the law and has led a very productive life, going to school and working. He is ashamed and has to live with what he did when he was 13 years old. He now has to register as a sexual offender and until he is 38 years old, and live with the stigma that he is a sexual offender. I don't agree with registration for children who were one time offenders that were ok'd by psychiatrist and did not do anything illegal from the day of the event to 18 years of age. These are typically children that were confused, set right and do not pose any threat to the public. Even the parents did not want or expect him to have to register, they just wanted him to get help. It seems that for juveniles the pendulum has swung too far...I do agree with registration for adult offenders and even juvenile offenders that reoffend!
Posted by: Kara (not registered) on April 07, 2006 at 12:12 am
I do not think that it is right to exclude the developmentally disabled sex offenders from the state registry. Offensive behavior is offensive behavior regardless.
Posted by: MEL (not registered) on April 10, 2006 at 09:51 pm
I BELIEVE THAT EVERY SEX OFFENDER SHOULD BE REGISTER IN THE U.S AS LONG AS THEY LIVE NOT FOR A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME LIKE IN CERSTAIN STATES. ALSO, SEX OFFENDERS SHOULD HAVE TO REGISTER IN NATIONWIDE DATABASE, EVERY STATE SHOULD HAVE THE SAME DATABASE TO BE ABLE TO TRACK THESE OFFENDERS. IN MATTER OF FACT THE STATE SHOULD BE ABLE TO TRACK THESE OFFENDERS BY ANY MEANS NECCESSARY. A MONITORING PILL SHOULD BE INJECTED BEFORE THEY ARE RELEASE TO BE ABLE TO KEEP TRACK.
Posted by: ANONYMOUS (not registered) on April 16, 2006 at 02:12 pm
My stepdaughter was molested by the man who lived with her mother. He also attempted to molest her younger sister. He wa convicted and serves time in Florida. He has since moved back to NJ. He is not registered because of his tier and because he was not considered to be high risk. Everyone knows the re-hab rate of these offenders is not very high. HE NEEDS TO BE REGISTERED. We have also received a tip that he is living with a woman with 2 young girls
Posted by: New Jersey MOM (not registered) on April 28, 2006 at 09:33 am
YOUR CHILD COULD BE NEXT ON THE LIST
Court eyes kid games in age of sex crime
Does 'playing doctor' trigger Megan's Law?
Wednesday, April 05, 2006
BY ROBERT SCHWANEBERG
Posted by: lilcybergrannie on September 05, 2006 at 04:09 pm
why are women sexual predators a convicted felons in florida that had sex with an 8 grade boy that is surposted to sign up for life as a sexual predators alouded to move to new jersey to beat the system and laugh in the faces of our legal system.she tells people that she walked on this charge that nothing really happens to women ,that she doesn,t have to be on the internet like she did in florida.and you know what she was right .in her eyes she can violate all the boys she wants and no one really cares because they say it a boy.... that young boy was totally befriend by her ,she was getting her teen age daughter to hook her up with theses little boys ,she would feed them booze and drugs and flirt with the young boys .it was like have a candy store in her house ,it is really sick but true .her picture and address and all the information related to her charge should be on the internet for people in general to protect their sons from sick child molester like her . I will be praying for all the young boys that she will be coming in contact.
Posted by: Lisa (not registered) on September 06, 2006 at 06:55 pm
Our Government is Really Beginning to Make ME SICK! I USE to believe we lived in a COUNTRY that wanted to PROTECT OUR CHILDREN BOTH GIRLS AND BOYS> but instead WE are PROTECTING CONVICTED SEXUAL OFFENDERS. We make laws and name them after the children like "MEGAN's LAW" YET .. YOU can a Woman can be convicted of LEWD and LACISCIVOUS BATTERY (FELONY) ON a MINOR UNDER in FL put on the internet for LIFETIME and the National Regitry as well but not fall under the right TIER in NJ THE STATE THAT MADE MEGAN'S LAW what is NJ A SAFE HAVEN FOR SEXUAL OFFENDERS TO PREY ON OUR INNOCENT CHILDREN AND YOU KNOW WHAT THIS PROBLEM IS NATIONWIDE ... WE JUST GOT LUCKY WITH ONE GREAT DISTRICT ATTORNEY IN FL PETER LOMBARDO A MAN OF THAT DOES NOT SEE GENDER OR RACE ... BUT SEES THE VICTIMS THE CHILDRENS AND WANTS TO PROTECT THEM. THANK YOU PETE ... THE WORLD NEEDS MORE PROSECUTERS THAT AREN'T AFRAID TO STAND UP LIKE YOU, WE NEED TO PROTECT OUR KIDS AND MAKE PARENTS AWARE ... KIDS FIRST.... OFFENDERS SECOND, THEY GAVE UP THEIR RIGHT TO BE TIERED WHEN THEY TOUCHED A CHILD. STAND UP AMERICA ... OR YOUR CHILD OR GRANDCHILD WILL OR COULD BE NEXT. I PRAY IT WON'T ... GOD BLESS YOU ALL, IT COULD BE RIGHT NEXT STORE AND YOU MAY NOT KNOW, THEY DON'T LOOK LIKE FREAKS, THEY LOOK JUST LIKE YOU AND ME.
Posted by: gor (not registered) on September 16, 2006 at 02:32 pm
do you really believe that the the reoffend rate is high as what the media is leading you to believe. Do you really think that you are going to legislate away sex offenses? If you can then why not do away with murder,burglury,robbery,drug dealing ect.
Its not the people that are registered that your children need to fear.
its the offenders that have not been caught that pose the greatest threat.
America has become a nation of brain dead sheep that are lacking in reason,logic, and common sense.
Posted by: Anonymous (not registered) on October 15, 2006 at 04:05 pm
I am one of those men excluded from the registry I was 21 and was lied to by a 15 year old girl. I had sex with her and she admitted to the police she lied about her age saying she was 22 . She looked 22 had a fake Id from newyork and acted as if. The judge seen this still labeled me forever but made it so I dont have to be on the internet
Posted by: conniebrooks on October 21, 2006 at 03:32 am
I keep my children away from ALL strangers. I know where they are at all TIMES, and WHO they are with at all TIMES. They do not go to our nieghbors because thier are no children his age to play with and I would be ok with it if he did because I have lived here ten years and know my nieghbors well. Everyone owns so when they move in they stay. This register is not going to keep your children safe, it is merely aimed at bieng an aid, knowing who, what, where, when and why at ALL TIMES will keep your children safe. And as one post read it is not the ones on the register we need to fear the most, it is the ones that have not been caught yet. Think about it people, then if you have any doubt where your children are go find them!!!!
Posted by: Karina (not registered) on January 09, 2007 at 12:12 am
ANONYMOUS,you knowledge about sex offenders is very little,so is about sex crimes.Do some study first and reading,sex crimes are lowest in ranking of re-offense.You would be very surprise if you know what really happened between"sex offender" and "victim",in some cases of course.It's sad how labeling people can destroy their lives.
Posted by: tom (not registered) on January 14, 2007 at 07:48 pm
Karina, who cares about thier lives bieng ruined by a "label" they should have thought about that they did the crime..they should all burn in hell
Posted by: Anonymous (not registered) on January 28, 2007 at 09:25 am
Conniebrooks:
You are quite correct. The most dangerous sex offenders are the ones that haven't been caught. New offenders constitute about 95% of all new sex cases. Again, while we must know where our children are at all times, and protect them from strangers, it happens that actaully, about 90% of child molestation cases occur in the hands of dads (plus step dads), cousins, uncles, family friends, teachers, coaches and other trusted acquiantancies. Of these, most of the children (about 75%) are molested in the safety of their own bedrooms. That makes me wonder why the stranger abduction myth (which constitutes less than 1% of the sex crimes) are not deceieving and fooling people.
Then to Tom:
Yes, definitely all sex offenders will burn in hell, unless they repent of their sins and accept God's grace through Jesus Christ. Unfortunately, so will the proud, the arrogant, unforgiving people, the liars, the hypocrites, the thieves, the racists, the tax cheaters, the fornicators or adulters (even though the immoral sex acts was with adults - and no children are involved). I will really hate to go to hell with sex offenders and murderers (including those who kill through abortions).
Posted by: nick1959 (not registered) on January 29, 2007 at 12:14 pm
Just a question.
Take the following scenario for example; suppose a fifteen year old female sophomore dates a seventeen year old male high school senior for six months. After his eighteenth birthday, in a moment of passion, they have sex and as luck would have it she becomes pregnant. Both sets of parents are naturally heartbroken, however their children are in love and both sets of parents are supportive of keeping the baby and the eventual marriage of the two young adults. The boy is willing to pay child support from his part-time job while finishing high school. Then the school administrator having been made aware of the situation by a teacher, is required by law to contact Child Protective Services. The girl is interview and she admits that she and her boyfriend were having sex and then Child Protective Services automatically starts the process of prosecuting the boy. Once more I ask; Should falling in love and acting on those feelings really be such an incredibly serious crime for this boy? This boy would in most states be labeled a sex offender and treated as such for ten years. Is this reasonable?
Posted by: Lori (not registered) on February 03, 2007 at 07:39 am
Has this country lost their minds?! I agree that sex offenders need to be registered and kept track of, however, there are some incidents that will forever haunt the "offender". Most deserve what they get, and then there are some that have actually leaarned from their mistakes and have gone on to be productive members of society, until (of course) someone finds out about their "registery" status and tries to ruin lives all over again. I know personally a gentleman that is "registered", he has 2 boys a good job, has paid his debt to society, and is still harassed by people that rely on labels. He is known at the police station, not because of his past charges, but because he goes in to register every year with a smile on his face and a kind word for every one. There are "registered offenders" out there that have actually learned their lesson. As well as victims that admit it was just as much their fault as it was the person prosecuted.
Posted by: Searching for Justice (not registered) on February 04, 2007 at 10:16 am
As a mother I agree with many of the postings about protecting our children from sexual predators and offenders. We should be able to access information about sexual predators in our towns. But what happens when teenagers get caught up in the Mass. sex laws.
My family and I are living a nightmare, and this is the first time I have written about the case against my son.
It started at a party in early 2001, my son was 171/2 at the time and stopped by a friends house. It was a Friday night and about 15 kids were there, most of who attended high school together. My son’s best friends girlfriend arrives with 3 of her friends. The party was unsupervised and there was alcohol and various drugs (marj, ridilin). The 4 girls were dropped off by a parent and ranged in the ages of 15 and 16. My sons best friend and girlfriend and my son started fooling around in the privacy of one of the bedrooms, (no intercourse) and were interrupted. They returned to the party. In the following days, rumors started circulating at school about what had happened at the party and the girlfriend was humiliated and confronted my son best friend. (Her father was a school teacher at the same school district.) He broke up with her shortly after the party, and she sent many e-mails to contact him,, to get together and finally sent an e-mail threatening him with repercussions due to the break-up. A month later she told her parents she was brutally raped at a party by her boyfriend and my son. My son was contacted by the police without my knowledge and was asked to come in for questioning; he did, and was told if he cooperated he would not be in trouble. He answered their questions and left. He was not informed that he had broken any laws. He did not hear anything else and moved on with his plans. He joined the Army that winter and was in South Carolina when we were informed the District Attorney was charging the two boys with rape. We were devastated. There was no physical evidence and piles of police statements and grand jury statements from the accuser and the witnesses that were full of decencies that clearly would dismiss her claims of rape. I emptied my saving and hired a reputable lawyer. (Continued on next post)
Posted by: Searching for Justice (not registered) on February 04, 2007 at 10:17 am
We then began the long journey of hearings, and continuances. I was told many times by my lawyer the DA would clearly see the discrepancies and dismiss the charges. Just before we were prepared to go to trial to fight the allegations, the DA offered a plea bargain. We were advised by our lawyer that it was the best thing to do. I didn't agree, but I was told that if we took the chance he may face 15+ years in prison. We took the plea Fall of 2005. And now we are living with repercussions of the case and plea. He works hard and looks forward to his engagement and marriage to his girlfriend. But he is haunted by the injustice of the case. He is registered and labeled with "Rape of a Child". He was a child himself; there is 1 year and 8 months between the accuser and my son. And I always thought you were a juvenile at the age of 17. Whether you are 16 or 66 it is against the law to have sex with a child under the age of 16. Every parent should be aware that if your 16 or 17 year old child is having sexual relationships with a 16 and under or 15 and under...they are breaking the law! The sex laws of Mass. need to be revised accordingly to age and situation. The high schools are filled with kids of those ages that are engaging in sex all the time. Not that I agree that 15 year old should be having sex...but they are, mostly out of curiosity and peer pressure, something that most of us experienced as well. But what happens if a child cries rape or just has casual sex with their girlfriend/boyfriend, your teenager will be charged and prosecuted as a sexual offender, face prison time and will have to register as a sex offender and will be listed nationally. This has ruined my young sons life and the chance to do many of the things he wanted to do. He is on probation with strict guidelines. He has just recently been sentence to prison for 5 YEARS for committing minor infractions to his probation, late on payments to probation, late to class, car unregistered at one time. Everyone involved in this case feels the time sentenced is too excessive. We are fighting with motions in court and hope to get my son out and justify his innocence of rape. Too many of the high risk sexual offenders walk the streets as my son sits in jail with his life ruined due to a false accusation and vague sexual offense laws. If anyone feels they can help, please post.
Posted by: Veronica (not registered) on March 24, 2007 at 10:22 am
I think that it is a public duty to let people know if sexual offenders are living near by. Especially if you are moving to a new area, teh most important thing is for our children to be safe!
Posted by: Anonymous (not registered) on June 19, 2007 at 06:51 pm
It is certainly a wonderful thing that these "people" are required to register. I personally think that they should never be allowed back into society. It sounds harsh, but lets think about the people they harm who are damaged forever mentally &/or physically. Yes it is unfortunate for those who didn't actually do anything wrong, but the benefit of keeping those who do away from us & our children outweighs anything else...in my opinion! I think that ALL criminals should be required to register.
Posted by: Anonymous (not registered) on June 24, 2007 at 07:42 pm
Ive committed a sex crime when I was 11 for underage sex with with a girl half a year younger than me. I was then put through the court system without me even understanding what was going on. Well I was put through a treatment facility at Starr Commonwealth, and released back home when I was 17, Im 19 now never committed any other crimes, I was kicked outta school when My name apeared on my 18th birthday on the internet. I never been able to get a job since then, I still live in my parents Basement, because my only other option is sleeping in a dumpster. Im going to be 20 in a month and I can only be depressed knowing that baring some major law changes, this is how its going to be for the rest of my life. why is it Im being punished and reminded daily of my misadventures when I was 11. Anyone of you can sit back and talk high and mighty about how dispicable we sex offenders are, but then again have anyone of you ever met a sex offender? We are not the terrible, drooling for children monsters the media and frenzied suburbia parents think we are. Im just a guy who is desperatly trying to get a life and have future. take it or leave it.
Posted by: Anonymous (not registered) on July 25, 2007 at 10:12 am
First off I would like to say that God is great. His blessings rain upon ANYONE... No matter who it is or what they have done, we are all still God's children. For sexual offenders, yeah I agree that the ones who repeatedly commits these offenses are the ones that should be closely monitored. But at the same time, there are a lot of flaws in the justice system as far as sex offenses are concerned. Any man or woman with that label are no longer human beings in society, even the ones that made a 1 time mistake. It isnt fair to completely robbed the offenders that have learned from their mistakes, their dignity or sanity. All those who are strongly against offenders being free in society after being caught, put yourself in their shoes. If you know in your heart that you made a mistake and you're doing everything in your power to make amends, wouldn't you want people to see that too? Im not saying give 2nd chances to dangerous offenders or anything, but to those who turned their lives around due to their situation. Anyone and everyone deserves a 2nd chance. The real judge in all of our lives rests upon the Lord Jesus Christ and He is a forgiving God. Why can't we follow Christ and be the same? There's hope for everyone, even some criminals. Its a matter of the justice system seeing it that way because not all offenders are what society labels them as. In the Book of Luke it says, "The measure of forgiveness you deal to other will be dealt to you in return." Its time we stop being close minded and see that not all of these so called "Sex Offenders" are terrible people. Who are you to judge them? Leave the judging to God...
Posted by: anonymous (not registered) on July 28, 2007 at 10:43 pm
I cannot understand how these guys live close to elementary schools. Some of them live just one block away from an elementary school. That is really scary. Officials should put more attention to that.
Well I suggest you DO understand...How wacked out are we as a society? You are worried that some offenders live near schools? Offenders are also members of our families! They also stand at a Wal Mart urinal with your kid at the next urinal. Get real. These laws on distance etc. are just to scare the heck out of you and keep your mind off the war and real social problems. (and the tactic appears to be working) Just think about it ,rationally, for a few minutes. All convicts will eventually have access to your kid. Unless they are serving for life...and even then, some get out. Only your education can make you safe and the assurance that crimnals get as much rehabilitation as possible so that they won't reoffend!
It is upsetting that these types of people live near us, our children, our grandchildre, etc... But if they were reg... as supposed too, and the police, and State knew where they lived, they would not be there in the first place. So it is called cracks in the systems, and lack of paying attenshone. On the other hand some of these Offenders, were just teenagers having sex, and the parents got madd, and now they are labled for something that was both agreed upon. Which is wrong on the States parts, as well as for the falsely accused Offenders out there. But no matter where you live in todays world there is always going to be someone whos done somethign that they have to pay for, even if it's not a sexual offender, or preditor. You just have to atch your children to the best of your being, and hope that nothing happens to them such as your worst fears. But always know that it;s not always the Offenders, as well as the Preditors it can be your friends, family, anyone you really trust that you would never think would hurt your child, so no matter what type of person you are, or what crime you have done, there will always be others you have to worry about in the real world. Tammy (HexGirl)
Posted by: cherri (not registered) on September 26, 2007 at 12:59 pm
Every sex offender should be listed in New Jersey. My son was molested by a man from the age of 4 until 12. He is not listed on the sex offender list even though charges were brought for molestation of a 2 year old in l989. My son just now came forward at the age of 34 and we cannot do anything because of the statue of limitation. This man needs to be stopped. His employment is a daycare facility.
Posted by: Anonymous (not registered) on January 08, 2008 at 11:47 pm
i am responding to VICKI, again another comment that is fear based. A person that knows what they did wrong and have a conscience will not reoffend. the ones that are likely to reoffend are the ones that should be posted online. We are not in the 1400's in France were you publically hang people for what they have previously done or awhat if they do that again and so on. I believe if every sex offender was to reoffend, every single child would be a victim, because according to national stats, 1 person out of 4 will be abused in their lives which means that their would be as many sexual predators than people who are not. please let's it real, I am much more afraid of serial killers and drunk drivers behind the wheel of a 2 ton weapon.
Posted by: Anonymous (not registered) on January 08, 2008 at 11:50 pm
the comment is for cherri, what is the statue of limitation? I thought that his previous conviction was for a 2 year old boy case which should be different than your son's case
Posted by: Anonymous (not registered) on March 04, 2008 at 03:02 pm
When I was only 18 i dated a boy in trenton new jersey for a while. i thought i knew alot about him until just last week i went on the internet and looked registered sex affenders for new jersey and there was his face. He assualted a girl while i was still with him and i never knew anything about it. i was really shocked to see his face there. now hes wanted for rape on a minor.
to NJ 3/4: So what is your point? Maybe you should get to know boyfriends better? On the other hand, if this is "love", you can work through this.
Posted by: Ocean County NJ (not registered) on March 19, 2008 at 09:17 pm
THIS WEBSITE IS DEFINITELY NOT "UPDATED" WITH YOUR SEX OFFEDERS INFORMATION. IF THERE'S ANYONE OUT THERE VIEWING THESE COMMENTS LOCATE YOUR LOCAL POLICE STATION FOR UPDATED INFORMATION OR CALL THIS WEBSITE!
Posted by: eileen (not registered) on March 30, 2008 at 01:11 pm
they are bunching all kinds of offenses in with the registry. not just sexual predators. check out john stossel at http://www.abcnews.go.com/2020/AgeOfConsent/ it is absolutly insane to think you can trust these websites because there are so many people on them that do not belong on them. its sad that our tax payers money goes to programs that are not really nessesary nor working. the more names the registry adds the more money that state gets. money should be spent teaching parents how to watch there children. im sorry but a child who is molested for many years in one home there is something wrong with the parent. you dont want the government controlling our lives but yet you want them to take taxes from hardworking people to watch your children..
Posted by: Anonymous (not registered) on April 10, 2008 at 11:15 pm
I think this should be changed you have a person whom was prosecuted for this crime in Mount Laurel NJ who lives right behind a elementry school and attends Lenape high school and will gradute with the class of 2008 wow what a shame the public has the right to know who their children attend school with and who they cheer for at the graduation this law should be revised for the safety of our children
Posted by: wow (not registered) on April 10, 2008 at 11:21 pm
this person just did this he is at legal age and attends Lenape high school shouldn't the parents be aware of what is in their school plus he will graduate with the class of 2008 the crimes of sexual assault are serious and he was convicted but allowed to be in public school to graduate I found this out from a friend of a friend who knows what was going on ask the lenape school district why they never notified parents of this thing he is registered now you are educating them with our tax dollars why
Posted by: victom (not registered) on June 28, 2008 at 09:47 pm
all sex offenders need to be shot. no reason at all is good enough to keep t hem in jail feed them house them provide them with clean clothes tv food. then when they get out you have all heard it on the news in youre area wherever you live they repeat. I dont care male or female 34cents bang done 5 10 12 years in prison convicted beyond resonable doubt youre dead
Posted by: Anonymous (not registered) on August 15, 2008 at 01:42 pm
If even one child is saved from harm then the action, whatever it is, is worth it, right?
Shouldn't the penalties against sex offenders apply to any person who harms a child in any way? Or are we saying that some kinds of abuses are OK and others are not?
Why is it I can go on the Internet and see where all the sex offenders live, but I am not allowed to see where all the people who dealt drugs to minors live?
How high is the reoffense rate for sex offenders? Take a peak at
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/rsorp94.htm
If you open the document and go to the documents "page 1", center column, 3rd paragraph it states:
"Compared to non-sex offenders
released from State prisons, released
sex offenders were 4 times more likely
to be rearrested for a sex crime.
Within the first 3 years following their
release from prison in 1994, 5.3% (517
of the 9,691) of released sex offenders
were rearrested for a sex crime. The
rate for the 262,420 released non-sex
offenders was lower, 1.3% (3,328 of
262,420).
What does it say? Most people interpret the data presented here as justification of our sex crime laws - after all, the sex offenders are four times more likely to be arrested for sex crimes, we should be concerned about this right?
But what about the fact that the sex offenders had 517 potential sexual victims and the non-sex offenders had 3,328 potential sexual victims during the same time period.
So, who says that the most we can do to protect our children is to lock the sex offenders away for life so that only 83 percent of the sex crimes committed by known felons continue unchecked?
Don't all raise your hands at once now.
We need something in this country. Maybe what we need is better public tracking for ALL felons, so we know where the other 83 percent of sexually violent felons are, and laws that are equally tough on all forms of child abuse and the abusers.
(A woman, in NJ, starved her three boys to the point that they were eating the plaster off the walls. Who here thinks she would not benefit from a little therapy? Who thinks she should be allowed to have more kids, especially boys, whenever she wants?)
Making all forms of child abuse a felony, with Megan's law, Civil Commitment, Public Notification, Mandatory therapy, Address verification, etc. could become expensive. But to do anything less is to state that you have placed a price tag on your child and it does not say "priceless" on it.
Posted by: cath (not registered) on September 19, 2008 at 11:39 pm
I believe no matter what they all should be made available to view. I am a mother who's child was hurt by one of these freaks and he now has his own myspace page and just moved and has a young girl friend and no one is even aware of the crime he did. I am protecting my self because the law will not and I am making sure that any chance I get to let someone know who he is I will do so because they have the right to know who this guy is.
Posted by: RACHEL (not registered) on October 20, 2008 at 11:01 pm
My best friend is female is now 19 yrs old and lives in NJ. She was molested by her Mothers Ex-Husband (Not her Father) for years and just recently told her Family. Shockingly, you would think her Mother gave a DAM and would help her daughter go to police..sadly she's won't and I want ANYONE out there to help with some advice for her. My friend is an AMAZING person and it wasn't her fault at all. What can I tell her to do? HELP. HELP...anyone that know someone in NJ who represents the OFFENDED?
Posted by: Oldtimer on October 22, 2008 at 09:44 am
Rachael: maybe she should approach the cops, without her mother.
Who is the Offender? "In at least 90 percent of c... more
I followed instructions and can't get it to work.... more
I noticed that your county doesn't have a red dot... more
At nine or ten years old I was very curious about ... more
The website is useless!!!! I have contacted My Sp... more
To TomeBaden : Yes these registries are just for h... more
HI ,My exwife married a Registered Sex offender (L... more
if u don't like puerto rico what r u doing lookin... more
To: "it hurt"...Yes, I'm sure you were hurt. N... more
After reading the comments on this site, I truly d... more
Police Jobs The need for qualified law enforcement and security professionals is growing fast.
Homeland Security Jobs Secure your future while protecting your country. Get a career that helps us all to feel safer. Earn your criminal justice, law enforcement or paralegal degree and learn the skills you need to succeed in this exciting and deeply rewarding field.
Legal Match Need a Lawyer? LegalMatch allows you to present your case, and respond only to attorneys who want to help you. It's free & confidential.
Fingerprint
& DNA Child ID Kit Recommended by law enforcement, each Child ID Kit includes
a fingerprinting kit, two sterile cotton swabs, one DNA isolation card, a plastic
sleeve for final storage, and easy-to-use instructions for parents.
