"Read on if you want to learn somthing."
Being I am from California I will use California as my Model State and most other states seem to follow California anyway.
California was the first State to Start tracking sex offenders in the year of 1945 (65 years ago)it now has 88,000 offenders in its database.
The major majority of all offenders everywhere were and are a family member or living in the same house as the victim or was a close friend of the victim or the family. NOT some stranger coming out of the bushes.
The United States has over 1,000,000 (one million) sex offenders being tracked at this time.( so expect a sex offender to live somewhere near or even in your neighborhood even next door.
Only 3.5 percent of all offenders everywhere are dangerous violent sexual pedators.
Only 15 percent everywhere have the disorder of being a pedrophile
Over 80 percent of all offenders are of the one time only lude and lacervious act Its california penel code law 288.A(laymens term is a simple wrongful and unlawful touching, feeling or groping without the use of force fear violence or threats and most were committed many years ago.
the major majority of cases the offender was drunk or on drugs at the time of the offense.
no repeat sexual crimes,
The offender was not sent to a state prison or vacility was given three (3) years of probation and it was finished without violation. the major majority of offenders took and completed a state certified sexual treatment course for one and one half years these offenders have been out of custody for many years without any repeat sex offenses of any kind, have no prior history of any violent crimes, no prior felonies the majority of all these offender do have and still show remorse of their offence. if a static 99 sex offender exam was completed upon these offenders it would clearly show a very low danger or threat rate and a very low chance of reoffending with another sex offence.
it is NOT possible to correctly watch 88,000 persons in one state and just as impossible for our country to watch over one million persons. There are only one percent everywhere that a death occurs from a sex offender. Sex offenders reoffend less than any other crime in our country.
More to come as my investigation goes on.


only 3.5 percent of all offenders are predator

Sex offender report part 2.
If you still want to learn somthing Read On:
As I wrote it appears that the Major Majority of sexual offenders through out the country are the low threat and low profile offender.
But what shocked me the most was the fact that most local and state governments were already aware of this fact.
After I had learned this fact through my investigation I was wondering a little so I went to the Center of missing and expolited childern web site and after it what was like pulling teeth I got the stats and was also shocked to find the folling:
the Center's database showing some 78,500 missing persons was that 65 percent of the missing persons were just simple run away teenagers and another 20 percent was just a child missing due to a non custody parent taking the child from the parent with custody due to the parent with custody not giving or not allowing the non custody parent proper or reasonable visitation and due to the courts not giving proper assistance to this parent gets frustrated and without using good judgement ends up taking the child.
And another 5 percent was a child taken by a non parent realitive such as the Grand parents ,sister or brother etc.
So it turned ou that some 90 percent of the missing were by non suspicious means.
So it appears that local and state governments and private agencys are making things appear much worse than they really are "Why would they want to do such a thing?" "FOLLOW THE MONEY" you are not going to get the Funding, Special programs, and Donations you want unless you can show a need, So they make it appear that there is a much bigger need as to get bigger Funding,More Programs and Donations
But do they have to use such fear factors and Scare Tactics using the love of our children and our wives to do it? and at the same time trying to make it look like they are not being soft on crime.
The proof is in the facts and there is much more to come as I find out more through my investigation. more to come!

Sex offender report part 3
if you still want to learn somthing "read on"
As I have found through my investigation there seems to be a great deal of misconceptions and myths regarding sex offenders and it appears to be being done with intent by local and state governments and private agencys.
It is and has been known that only a very small percent of all persons who have a sexual crime in their history are a true and present danger to the general public.
"Yes" it is a true fact that the most dangerous of the sex offenders the SVP and many persons with a pedophile disorders their disorders do run long and deep to the fact that there is very little hope that they will ever be 100 percent safe,even with the new and better exams such as the static 99 there is always going to be some that fall through the cracks but with a 97 to 98.5 of being correct to knowing which offenders are a true and present danger you should stand up and cheer to this fact.
But here is the rub according to the Dept of mental health and the many Dr(s) and PhD who in our courts as to give advice to our judges and DA(s) over 80 percent of all sex offenders it has been found that rehab does work.
But when a state mandates life time tracking of all sex offenders it causes most of the general public in thinking that all sex offenders are forever broken.
I myself understand how this could happen but this has and will cause many more misconceptions an myths untill some very important changes are made.
The mandated life time tracking needs to be changed to worded as "UP TO LIFETIME" This will allow for our courts to be more stable yet flexable in its rulings it will also take away the myth that all sex offenders are forever dangerous.
As I stated there is no way whatsoever that the amount of persons in all the databases can ever be properly watched over. It is really very simple make the amount of persons who need to be watched over to an amount that can properly be watched over, is it that hard to understand? We now know that 80 percent are not a danger to the public infact they are termed as being a low profile and a low threat to the genral public make it law that say somthing as these persons after a specfic amount of time such as 10 years after completion of all their requirments(probation requirments) this is about 13 years of being free for most low profile offenders and not having any more arrests or convictions regarding that of a sexual nature allow these persons to take a modified type of the static 99 for persons who have been out of custody for such a long time and you can rest assured that they will come up as low low towards being a danger to the public, allow these persons to be pulled out of the databases and all you will have left is the true and dangerous sex offenders, so when a person feels that a specific persons seems a bit suspicious and checks through the states database you can bet that this person is someone who needs to be watched more closly such as a community watch etc. if not there is over 80 percent chance that this person is not a dangerous sex offender but causes the neighbor to become worried when infact there is really no need to be.
It also allows for a much less needs in funding, programs etc. And it allows for a state not to appear to be soft on crime, being the amount of offenders are now 80 percent less.
My investigation still is in prograss so stay in tune for my next report. remember I am not giving advise as per arm chair speculation I am using proved science throughout my investgation.

My sex offender comments part 4.
"want to learn somthing? read on!
As one can see by my comments so far, I am not attempting to state facts that are already will known regarding sex offenders. I am giving not well known information found through my investigation that have caused severe misunderstandings and myths as to the general public, and I myself was surprised as to what I have found so far and why. And being my wife worked for the U.S. Dept of justice for over 20 years herself as a numbers cruncher and my daughter who is highly trained herself and teaches abnormal traits, types, and kinds for law enforcement being they have to deal with it everyday. And I have my duel degree in medical/health science and administration of justice and I more or less am able to hear and understand their termonology what my wife and daughter say, and look into other routes of information and can spell it it out in a more laymens terms so everyone can understand.
The information that I am giving comes from the Dept.of justice ,the Dept of mental health,many PhD(s) and Dr.(s)who work within the criminal justice system through our courts and working hand in hand with the county whom I spoke. So please understand that it is "NOT" by what is termed as arm chair spectlication or monday night quaterbacks.
Well so far it appears that being California was the first to start lifetime tracking of sex offenders in 1945 and now has 88,000 persons in the California Sex Offender data base alone and there is at present count just over 1 million sex offenders in the United States.(So after being advised of this fact it should no longer be a surprise that a person with a sex crime in their history may live in your neighborhood.
But as I found out by checking the stats, the majority of all sex offenders were family members, a person living within the same home, a close friend to the family and the victim or a close and known neighbor "NOT BY A STRANGER" this is a myth the true fact is that less than 5 percent of all sex crimes throughout the entire United States were committed by a stranger and less than 1 percent of all sex crimes ended with a death of a victim.
Over 80 percent of all persons being tracked through the states sex offender data bases are what is termed as being low,low threat and low,low profile sex crime. one of these sex crimes in California is a statue 288.A lude and lascivious act upon a person under 14. The laymens term is better understood as bein a wrongful and unlawful Simple touching,feeling, or groping with a sexual intent without the use of any violence, force, injury or threats.
Also it appears that the major majority of these 288.A were a one time offense and the major majority of these occured 10,20, 30 years ago many even longer. We found that most underwent sexual rehab. (according to the Dept. of mental health and the many other professionals working within this field are all saying that for these offenders rehab is working!the major majority of these offenders completed their probation without a violation for another sex crime (another misunderstanding) the ones that did violate the major majority of these were due to not being able to keep up with the very high (up to $10,000 dollars for some)fines and some for not being able to keep up with the rehab payments of $400.00 a month as long as 2 1/2 years. The major majority of these offenders according to some PhD(s)still have and show remorse for what they did even after so many years ago for many. Also it was found through looking through the stats, that the magority of these offenders "WAS" infact under the influence of alcohol and or drugs (some causing lack of sleep for some over a week very dangerous and does infact cause abnormal thoughts and traits)
And the latest exam showing the prediction of an offender to reoffend another sex crime "The Static 99" has proven to be very high in correct prediction of this fact (97.5 percent to 98 percent) and thats not bad at all folks.
But according to some sorces turns out that there was a rude awaking for many, when states started changing the laws and adding new laws (not being able to live a specific destance from a school or park or allowed to travel down specific roads,GPS tracking etc. and the laws regarding the ability for anyone to go upon the internet and look who is in the database. this has caused the majority of these offenders who have a low threat low profile still with remorse but now not able to find proper housing, decent work, and the general public not aware of these offenders are just not what can be termed as a true and present danger and threat to the public are now starting to feel that they have now become the victims and that these offenders don't have a voice to speak for them (seems that to speak out regarding this wrongful situation is under the same spotlight and same reason the law was inacted in the first place as follows;
The Newsmedia puts out one of the tragic but very rare sex cases ending with a death etc. The general public get inraged with passion and then votes in these new laws with the intent for safety of our children, women etc.
But here is the rub, our local,and state governments, and even private sectors live on taxes,funding,special programs,donations and support from persons like you so the last thing they are going to do is to put exceptions in the laws as to be deemed soft on crime soft on the safety of our children. the fact is that these new laws were really never intended towards the non dangerous, non threat, low profile offender who did not use violence in their offense and who do not even have any history of being violent. Also, I must bring to everyones attention it has and is according to offenders we have talked with, causing a very serious situation to the point that many are talking about a very large class action suite against The State of California being the state has made it for the magority of offenders almost impossible to locate proper housing and work some get a motel room but then the public starts pickitting one of very few places they can live and what happens? THEY BECOME HOMELESS!! then what do you all start doing? you scream and cry that the whole reason for tracking the sex offender is to know where they work and live but know they have no job they have no address.
May I make a sugesstion don't put any sanctions whatsoever upon these persons to do so and you are openinging the stats up for a class action law suite that the general public would lose. Get back to the voting table and fix what you broke or you made your bed so sleep in it, you made your own dinner now you eat it.
as I was about to say these non violent,non dangerous,low threat,low proile offenders are going to do the only thing they feel they can and that is to go "underground" now people might say who cares so what their not a threat right?
But here is another rub as per the local and state governments ALL SEX OFFENDERS ARE ALL IN THE SAME BASKET.
This makes the need look bigger to get higher taxes,funding, donations etc. and again the state does not want to "APPEAR" to be soft on crime so there will not be a who cares or no big deal the state will make it a big deal.
First off the laws we made don't work in fact they could even make things more dangerous in the long run, you broke it fix it. Start by changing the wording from lifetime tracking of sex offenders to the wording "up to"lifetime tracking all sexual offenders then put a time limit upon how long the non dangerous,low threat,low profile offender is kept in the system such as 5 10 15 years then start to weed them out this will allow that 80 percent to get proper work and housing and then this will allow for more areas for the true and present dangerous offenders the SVP and pedophiles to be able to get housing in the areas that were once closed to them because a non dangerous,low threat , low profile offender but now the lower has moved to areas they were more or less closed to before and this will open up more areas where the more dangerous offender can now work and be housed.And no one goes underground!
I must state one mor time for the record that there is no real 100 percents not yet anyway there is always going to be dangerous persons as per our children and or wives and daughters. Science and modern day law enforcement is such more advanced than it was back in 1945 when most of the laws were first mandated. back in 1945 they thought that all persons who committed a sex crime was forever broken well,we know that is no longer true for the majority of offenders rehab has been shown to be working. But the true danger that still lies before us.The dangerous sex offenders predator and the pedophill there traits and charactics run long and deep within them and the amount of damage that has caused for such persons to become what they are will be a true and dangerous aspect and these are the persons that we must keep heed to watchover. There is no way at the present time and it will be a long time in coming before we as a people as a nation will have the abilty to watch over number of sex offenders that we have now and the number will just keep getting larger. As I stated we need to start by weeding the ones that we have found to be the very least and with all repect these offenders are the ones who are not going to reoffend there track record proves that.

PEACE BE WITH US ALL.

The most dangerous and largest threat being the SVP (sexual violent predator) Not violent but just as much a danger is the pedophile predator such as you hear regarding the ones on the internet. But we all must keep a very open mind here being yes! a predator or a pedophile of any kind is a sex offender yes BUT! a sex offender does not have to be a predator or a pedophile and over 80 percent are not!

We have made great many new laws throughout the country due to and being under hast and fear and by the states not wanting to appear weak on sex laws.It appears that a majority of the facts that we all have been told early on and at late regarding sex offenders are NOT! all true. All anyone has to do(and I do say to any and all person that I endorse everyon to type "sex offender myths" in any search program look at all the sites that are there regarding this.) Let it be known first off that I am NOT! endorcing anyhing regarding the true and present dagerous preadors and or pedophiles for they deserve what has been mandated to them by law,But I want good laws and I want just and reasonable laws, law that work, laws that don't just look good on paper. Just recently in California a female teacher had affairs with two of her under age students yes! this is a wrong and bad thing for her to have done I do truly agree. But the DA is going for 67 felonys. Come on people! am I the only one who is appaled by this overzelous DA. But Come on 67 Felonys! this is what is known as a look the other way government HATE CRIME!